Subversion Repositories f9daq

Rev

Blame | Last modification | View Log | RSS feed

  1. %\documentstyle[epsfig]{aipproc}
  2. \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
  3. %\documentclass[12pt,a4paper,twoside]{article}
  4. \textwidth 15. true cm \textheight 22.3 true cm
  5. \hoffset=-7 mm \voffset=-10 mm
  6.  
  7. \usepackage{epsfig}
  8. %\usepackage{graphics}
  9. \newcommand{\epsdir}{eps/}
  10. %\newcommand{\epsdir}{./}
  11.  
  12. %\setcounter{topnumber}{1}
  13. \renewcommand{\topfraction}{0.9}
  14. %\setcounter{bottomnumber}{1}
  15. \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{0.9}
  16. \setcounter{totalnumber}{5}
  17. \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.1}
  18. %\renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{0.1}
  19. %\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{1}
  20. \renewcommand{\dbltopfraction}{0.9}
  21. %\renewcommand{\dblfloatpagefraction}{0.1}
  22. %\setlength{\floatsep}{0.1}
  23. %\setlength{\textfloatsep}{0.1}
  24. %\setlength{\intextsep}{0.1}
  25. %\setlength{\dblfloatsep}{0.1}
  26. %\setlength{\dbltextfloatsep}{0.1}
  27.  
  28. %\usepackage{draftwatermark}
  29. %\SetWatermarkText{Lab copy}
  30. %\SetWatermarkLightness{0.5}
  31. %\SetWatermarkScale{4}
  32.  
  33. \begin{document}
  34. \begin{sloppypar}
  35.  
  36. \title{MEASUREMENT OF CHERENKOV RINGS WITH MULTIANODE PHOTOMULTIPLIERS}
  37. \author{S.Korpar$^{1,2}$, R.Pestotnik$^{2}$, P.Kri\v zan$^{3,2}$,
  38.        A.Gori\v sek$^2$, A.Stanovnik$^{4,2}$
  39. \\$^1${\it \small Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,
  40.                  University of Maribor, Slovenia}
  41. \\$^2${\it \small Jo\v zef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia}
  42. \\ $^3${\it \small Faculty of Mathematics and Physics,
  43.                   University of Ljubljana, Slovenia}
  44. \\ $^4${\it \small Faculty of Electrical Engineering,
  45.                   University of Ljubljana, Slovenia} }  
  46.  
  47. \maketitle
  48.  
  49. %Contents:
  50. %1. Introduction
  51. %2. Position sensitive photomultipliers: Hamamatsu R5900-M16 and R5900-L16
  52. %3. Experimental setu-up
  53. %4. Measurement  
  54. %* HV plateau
  55. %* Threshold scan
  56. %* Cross-talk
  57. %* Diffraction pattern
  58.  
  59. \section*{Abstract}
  60. The present paper describes a laboratory course to be held at the
  61. Danube School on Instrumentation in Elementary Particle \& Nuclear
  62. Physics in Novi Sad, Serbia. It is a continuation and upgrade of
  63. similar courses held in
  64. Bogota, Colombia in 2013,
  65. Bariloche, Argentina in 2010,
  66. Itacuru\c{c}a, Brasil in 2003 \cite{Icfa},
  67. Istanbul in 1999 and 2002 and
  68. in Faure, South Africa in 2001.
  69. The main purpose of this exercise is to introduce the student to the
  70. Ring Imaging CHerenkov technique. The student will work with multianode
  71. photomultipliers (Hamamatsu, R5900-M16 and R5900-L16 PMT's), with which
  72. measurements requiring position sensitive detection of single photons
  73. will be performed. The first exercise is a measurement of the diffraction
  74. pattern by counting individual photons passing through a slit, and the
  75. second is a measurement of Cherenkov rings produced by cosmic muons in
  76. an aerogel radiator.
  77.  
  78. \section{Introduction}
  79. Photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), or photomultipliers (PMs) for short, are
  80. sensitive detectors of weak light signals capable of detecting even single
  81. photons \cite{Knoll,Leo}. The photomultiplier consists of an evacuated
  82. glass vessel containing a photocathode, from which incident photons may eject
  83. an electron, and a system of electrodes (dynodes) in which this photoelectron
  84. is multiplied to give a measurable electrical signal at the anode. The
  85. photocathode, the dynodes and the anode have leads through the glass to the
  86. outside of the vessel, enabling connections of high voltage and allowing the
  87. signals to be further processed by suitable electronics. The photomultiplier
  88. is thus plugged into a photomultiplier base, which consists of a resistor
  89. chain providing appropriate voltages for the dynodes and a
  90. load resistor, on which the signal appears. In some cases, potentiometers are
  91. provided for adjusting the voltage on the electrodes for focusing the
  92. photoelectrons to the first dynode and capacitors or Zener diodes to stabilize
  93. the voltage on the last dynodes in case of high rate and high gain operation
  94. (Fig.~\ref{fig1}).
  95.  
  96. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  97. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir fp.eps,width=8cm,angle=0.0}}
  98. \caption{Voltage divider.}
  99. \label{fig1}
  100. \end{figure}
  101.  
  102. An important parameter of a photomultiplier is the quantum
  103. efficiency (QE), defined as the ratio of the number of photoelectrons ejected
  104. from the photocathode to the number of photons incident on the
  105. photomultiplier. Clearly, this parameter is a function of the energy (or
  106. wavelength) of the incident photons and is a product of the probability for
  107. the photoelectric effect and the probability for the electron to escape from
  108. the photocathode. The most common photocathode materials are
  109. semiconductors containing alkali elements. The quantum efficiency
  110. QE($\lambda$)  is connected to the photocathode radiant sensitivity
  111. S($\lambda$), which is defined as the photocathode current divided by the
  112. incident photon power:
  113. $$S(\lambda ) = QE(\lambda ){e_0 \lambda \over h c}$$
  114. The quantum efficiency is cut off on the low
  115. energy side by the vanishing probability for the
  116. photoelectron to escape into the vacuum and on the high energy
  117. side by photon absorption in the PM glass window.
  118. The photoelectrons ejected from
  119. the photocathode are focused to the first dynode, where they eject more
  120. electrons. The electron multiplication is given by the secondary emission
  121. factor, which depends on the incident electron energy as well as on the dynode
  122. material.
  123. Usually, there are several dynodes (10 to 12) leading to an overall
  124. amplification of about 10$^6$  to 10$^7$.
  125. In experimental physics, photomultipliers are most often used as detectors of
  126. scintillations, which charged particles, neutrons or gamma rays produce when
  127. depositing some or all of their energy in special scintillating materials.
  128. PMs may also be used as
  129. position sensitive detectors of single photons, especially for the Ring
  130. Imaging  Cherenkov (RICH) counters in high energy physics experiments
  131. \cite{Debbe,Krizan,Arino,Akopov}.
  132. The present laboratory course will introduce two such photomultiplier
  133. tubes produced by Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.; the R5900-M16 and the R5900-L16
  134. multianode photomultipliers.
  135. \section{Position sensitive photomultipliers}  
  136. The R5900 series M16 and L16
  137. multianode photomultipliers are shown in
  138. Fig.~\ref{fig2}. The M16 is divided into 4 x 4 = 16 anode outputs, each
  139. covering a pad size of 4.5 x 4.5 mm$^2$. The
  140. L16 anode, on the other hand, is divided into 16 strips of 16 mm length and
  141. 1 mm pitch.  The exact dimensions of the photomultipliers and the locations
  142. of the electrode pin connectors are given in the data sheets \cite{Hama}.
  143. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  144.  \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir pmt2.eps,width=9cm}}
  145.  \caption{Hamamatsu multianode photomultipliers (L16, M16, M16 from left
  146.         to right).}
  147.  \label{fig2}
  148. \end{figure}  
  149. The quantum efficiency and the radiant sensitivity given by the
  150. manufacturer for L16 photomultipliers are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig3}.
  151. It seems that allowance has to be made for an additional
  152. efficiency factor due to less than perfect collection and transmission
  153. ($\sim$‚»80\%) of the photoelectrons by the dynode system \cite{Krizan}.
  154. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  155.  \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir L16.eps,width=7.5cm}}
  156.  \caption{Typical spectral response of L16 PMT \cite{Hama}.}
  157.  \label{fig3}
  158. \end{figure}
  159. The dynode system in these multianode
  160. photomultipliers differs considerably from those in conventional
  161. photomultipliers. It consists of foils with  specially shaped
  162. perforations or channels. On the walls of these channels, secondary emission
  163. takes place thus multiplying the number of electrons (Fig.~\ref{fig4}). With
  164. 10-12 such dynode foils, gains above 10$^6$  are reached. The anode dark
  165. current is mainly below 200 nA \cite{Hama}.
  166. Attention must be paid not to exceed the maximum allowed voltage
  167. of 900~V for L16 and 1000~V for M16 PMT and the maximum allowed current of 0.01 mA \cite{Hama}.
  168. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  169.  \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir MCtype.eps,width=8cm}}
  170.  \caption{Metal channel type PMT \cite{Hama-web}.}
  171.  \label{fig4}
  172. \end{figure}
  173. Of special interest
  174. e.g. in Cherenkov ring imaging is the position resolution, which is mainly
  175. given by the anode pad size. The cross-talk to
  176. adjacent channels is small and the response
  177. across the photocathode surface seems to be uniform to the level of some 10\%
  178. \cite{Krizan,Hama}.
  179. For the M16 photomultipliers, measurements have been made
  180. of single photoelectron pulse height distributions  showing a well  resolved
  181. single electron peak corresponding to a plateau on the
  182. rate-versus-voltage curve \cite{Krizan}. Tests with rates of
  183. 3 MHz/channel during 30 days \cite{Krizan} and two years of experience with the
  184. HERA-B photon detector \cite{Arino}, show that these photomultipliers operate
  185. smoothly even in otherwise hostile environments as are characteristic of the
  186. new high energy colliders. According to specifications \cite{Hama}, the pulse
  187. rise time is 0.8 ns with a transit time spread of 0.3 ns, so they could also
  188. be used for timing purposes.
  189. \section{Experimental set-up}
  190. The exercise is divided into three parts. The first consists of measuring the
  191. high voltage plateau and the position dependence of the M16 count rate
  192. for a pencil beam. The second part consists of measuring Cherenkov rings
  193. with an array of sixteen M16 PMTs. The third part of this
  194. exercise represents a measurement of a diffraction pattern by counting single
  195. photons with the L16 position-sensitive photomultiplier.
  196. \subsection{M16 - HV plateau and position dependence of the count rate}
  197. The experimental set-up for measuring the M16
  198. photomultiplier is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig5}. Light from the LED source
  199. is collimated by two pinholes,
  200. defining an illuminated spot of about 0.5 mm diameter on the
  201. photocathode.
  202. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  203. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir skica1.eps,height=7.5cm,angle=-90.0}}
  204. \caption{The experimental set-up for measuring the characteristics of M16 PMT.}
  205. \label{fig5}
  206. \end{figure}
  207. The photomultiplier is plugged into a PM base and both are
  208. enclosed in a light-tight box together with the light source and collimators.
  209. High voltage is provided by a HV power supply from which a cable leads to the
  210. PM base inside the light-tight box. Cables from  four anode
  211. pads connect each signal first to an amplifier, then discriminator and
  212. finally to a scaler. The plate on which the PMT is fastened, may
  213. be displaced in a direction transverse to the light beam by means
  214. of a screw thread (1 mm/turn), which could be operated from the outside of
  215. the box. The height of the beam is set in order to be centered on one
  216. of the four rows with four pads. After observing the set-up the box
  217. is closed and the count rate at given threshold is recorded as a function
  218. of high voltage (see Fig.6). The voltage is then set on the plateau
  219. and count rates of the four pads are measured as a function of the PM
  220. position relative to the light spot (Fig.7). From the results of this
  221. measurement one may study the position resolution, the cross talk between
  222. adjacent pads, the uniformity of pad response and the response variation
  223. across a given pad, which reflects the structure of the dynode channels,
  224. as also seen in Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
  225. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  226. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir M16hv.eps,width=11.5cm}}
  227. \caption{Plateau curves for 4 channels of the M16 PMT.}
  228. \label{fig6}
  229. \end{figure}
  230. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  231. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir M16pos.eps,width=11.5cm}}
  232. \caption{Count rate on 4 channels of the M16 PMT depending on the light
  233.         spot position.}
  234. \label{fig7}
  235. \end{figure}
  236. \clearpage
  237. \subsection{Array of M16 PMT's - Cherenkov rings}
  238. When the velocity $v = \beta c$ of a charged particle in a medium exceeds
  239. the speed of light $c/n$ in that medium (c is the speed of light in vacuum
  240. and n is the refractive index of the medium), the particle emits light at an
  241. angle with respect to it's direction of motion. This Cherenkov angle
  242. is determined by the relation
  243. $$\cos \theta _{c} = {1 \over {\beta n}}$$
  244. and the threshold velocity for emission of Cherenkov
  245. light is at $\beta _{th} = 1/n$.
  246. With a position sensitive detector of single photons, one may detect
  247. a Cherenkov ring image \cite{Nappi}, from which the Cherenkov angle and thus
  248. the particle velocity may be determined. As the particle momentum is
  249. measured by other components of a detector system, one may use the velocity
  250. measurement to calculate the particle mass. Thus, Cherenkov detectors are
  251. usually refered to as particle identification devices. Most large detector
  252. systems operating at the high energy accelerators and colliders, include such
  253. a Ring Imaging Cherenkov detector (RICH) \cite{Eingedi}.
  254. In the literature \cite{Nappi} we find
  255. that the number of detected photons is given by:
  256. $$N = N_0 \cdot L \cdot \sin ^2 \theta _{c}.$$
  257. $N_0$ is a figure of merit of the particular Cherenkov detector, which depends
  258. mainly on the efficiency of photon detection and the loss of photons
  259. between emission and detection. $L$ is the length of the radiator and
  260. $\theta _{c}$ is the Cherenkov angle.
  261. In the present exercise, we shall measure the Cherenkov photons radiated by
  262. high energy muons in an aerogel radiator.
  263. The muons are produced by cosmic rays in the upper layers of
  264. the atmosphere so are mainly incident from above onto the apparatus shown
  265. in Fig.~\ref{fig11}.
  266. The muon first gives a trigger signal in a scintillation counter and then
  267. enters two, 2 cm thick aerogel layers (n$_1$ = 1.0485, n$_2$ = 1.0619),
  268. where a $\beta \simeq 1$ muon would radiate Cherenkov photons at
  269. $\theta _c$ = $\arccos$(1/n) = 305(343) mrad. The Cherenkov photons are
  270. refracted into air and are detected by the photon detector lying
  271. $\simeq$16 cm below the aerogel radiator entrance surface.
  272. The hits are distributed
  273. on the circumference of a ring of aproximately 5 cm radius
  274. (for $\beta \simeq 1$ particles). The radiator thickness leads to an
  275. uncertainty in the emission point, which translates into a $\approx$7~mm
  276. uncertainty in the hit position
  277. on the photon detector. This uncertainty and the shortage of readout
  278. channels resulted in four adjacent anode pads of the M16 PMT
  279. being connected into one $9 \times 9$ mm$^2$ pixel.
  280. The PMT array consists of sixteen M16 PMT's on a $30 \times 30$ mm$^2$
  281. grid, so the geometrical acceptance of the photocathodes ($18 \times 18$
  282. mm$^2$) is 36 \%. From this geometrical acceptance and the photocathode
  283. quantum efficiency ($\simeq 20\%$ over  $\Delta$E $\simeq$ 1 eV),
  284. we estimate the figure of merit to be $N_0 \sim 15$ cm$^{-1}$. One may thus
  285. expect on average about 3 detected Cherenkov photons per full muon ring.
  286. As the number of photons is distributed statistically,
  287. a larger number (say 5 or 6) will be occasionally detected, allowing an
  288. estimate of the ring radius and thus the charged particle velocity.
  289. The PMT anode signals are led through a discriminator to a 64 channel
  290. multihit TDC unit (CAEN V673A) (Fig.~\ref{fig11}). The TDC is read out through
  291. the VME system into the computer (using WIENER PCI-VME interface), where
  292. appropriate algorithms reconstruct the  hit maps displaying the Cherenkov ring
  293. images.
  294. In Fig.~\ref{fig11.a} six events with high number of Cherenkov photons reconstructed are shown. They were taken at the ICFA Instrumentation School in Istanbul in 2002.
  295. \vspace{1.0cm}
  296. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  297. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir aerogel_rich.eps,width=11.0cm}}
  298. \caption{RICH counter for cosmic muons: the set-up.}  
  299. \label{fig11}
  300. \end{figure}
  301. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  302. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir compilation1.eps,width=11.0cm}}
  303. \caption{Reconstructed hits on the photon detector as obtained with the setup in Fig.~\ref{fig11}. Six events with high number of hits were selected. The two red circles define the maximal and minimal rings which correspond to Cherenkov photons irradiated at the beginning and at the end of the aerogel radiator, correspondingly. 2x2 PMT channels were connected together in one readout channel, to simplify the readout electronics.}
  304. \label{fig11.a}
  305. \end{figure}
  306. \clearpage
  307. \subsection{L16 - Diffraction pattern}
  308. The schematic diagram of this experimental set-up is shown in
  309. Fig.9. The light source is a light emitting diode
  310. (Fig.10). This light is passed through a slit of width D, on which
  311. diffraction occurs. The diffraction pattern is  given by
  312. $$j(\vartheta ) = j_0 {\sin ^2 \alpha \over {\alpha}^2}$$  
  313. where $\alpha = {\pi D \sin \vartheta \over \lambda}$
  314. and $\vartheta$ is the diffraction angle with respect to the beam direction. In
  315. terms of the distance x from the central maximum and the distance L between
  316. the slit and the photomultiplier, this angle is given by
  317. tg $\vartheta = x / L$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig9}). The first minimum in the
  318. diffraction pattern occurs at $\sin {\vartheta}_{min} = \lambda / D$. Assuming
  319. that the diffraction angle ${\vartheta}_{min}$ is small, the x-position of
  320. the minimum will be given by $x_{min}/L = \lambda / D$. In the present
  321. exercise one measures the position of the minimum and thus determines the slit
  322. width  $D = \lambda \cdot L / x_{min}$.
  323. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  324. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir skica2.eps,height=7.5cm,angle=-90.0}}
  325. \caption{The experimental set-up for measuring diffraction with the L16 PMT.}
  326. \label{fig8}
  327. \end{figure}
  328. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  329. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir spektri_mod.eps,height=6cm,angle=0.0}}
  330. \caption{Spectra of three different LED sources.}
  331. \label{fig8}
  332. \end{figure}
  333. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  334. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir skica3.eps,width=9.5cm}}
  335. \caption{Geometric parameters for the diffraction measurement.}
  336. \label{fig9}
  337. \end{figure}
  338. From the 16 anode strips, the signals are led through amplifiers into CAMAC
  339. discriminators and then to a 16 channel CAMAC scaler. The counting time is
  340. set by removing the veto pulse on the discriminator. This is performed via
  341. a CAMAC input/output register and a NIM timing unit.
  342. The register and the scaler are
  343. connected via CAMAC and GPIB to a personal computer, which runs a data acquisition
  344. programme and displays the diffraction histogram.
  345. With the 16 channels at 1 mm pitch only a 16 mm portion of the diffraction
  346. pattern could be measured simultaneously.
  347. In order to cover a broader range of diffraction angles, the photomultiplier may be displaced relative to the light beam by
  348. means of a screw thread (1mm/turn) operated from the outside of the
  349. light-tight box.
  350. A diffraction pattern is first demonstrated
  351. by using a light beam from a laser pointer and slits made
  352. from razor blades.
  353. The slits are then inserted onto the
  354. rails  in front of the light emitting diode, the distance $L$ is measured and
  355. the box is closed. The high voltage on the PMT is set to approximately 800 V
  356. and the current through the LED is adjusted for an acceptable count rate.
  357. The diffraction pattern is then measured in
  358. at least two different positions of the PMT relative to the light beam
  359. and the results are appropriately connected.
  360. From the distribution (Fig.~\ref{fig10}), one determines the position of the
  361. first minimum and then calculates the slit width D from the above equation.
  362. At this point the student may be reminded of the analogy between
  363. this experiment and the measurement of nuclear sizes by the so called
  364. diffraction scattering.
  365.  
  366. \begin{figure}[hbt]
  367. \centerline{\epsfig{file=\epsdir L16dif.eps,width=12cm}}
  368. \caption{Measured diffraction distribution.}
  369. \label{fig10}
  370. \end{figure}
  371.  
  372. In this exercise, the pedagogical problem of wave-particle duality is
  373. stressed. With sufficiently low
  374. counting rate one may in principle simultaneously observe the
  375. count increment of individual channels and the appearance of the diffraction
  376. histogram (Fig.~\ref{fig10}). The individual hit is a manifestation of the
  377. particle nature of the photon, while the diffraction distribution speaks of
  378. its wave properties.
  379.  
  380.  
  381. \clearpage
  382.  
  383. \section*{Acknowledgment}
  384. We are grateful to Hamamatsu Photonics K. K. for donating some of the
  385. multianode photomultipliers used in the present laboratory course.
  386.  
  387.  
  388. \begin{thebibliography}{99}  
  389.  
  390. %\section{Bibliography}
  391.  
  392. %\begin{enumerate}
  393. \bibitem{Icfa}
  394. %\item
  395. S.Korpar, P.Kri\v zan, A.Gori\v sek, A.Stanovnik,
  396. Tests of a position sensitive photomultiplier and measurement of diffraction
  397. pattern by counting single photons,\\
  398. ICFA'99 Instrumentation School, Istanbul, Turkey, AIP Conference Proceedings,
  399. Vol. 536, p. 340-348
  400. \bibitem{Knoll}
  401. %\item
  402. G.F.Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, John Wiley, 1989
  403. \bibitem{Leo}
  404. %\item
  405. W.R.Leo, Techniques for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments,
  406. Springer-Verlag, 1987
  407. \bibitem{Debbe}
  408. %\item
  409. R. Debbe et al., In-beam tests of a Ring Imaging Cherenkov detector
  410. with a multianode photomultiplier read-out,
  411. Nucl. Inst. and Meth. in Phys. Res. {\bf A362}(1995)253-260
  412. \bibitem{Krizan}
  413. %\item
  414. P.Kri\v zan et al., Tests of a Multianode PMT for the HERA-B RICH,\\
  415. Nucl. Inst. and Meth. in Phys. Res. {\bf A394}(1997)27-34
  416. \bibitem{Arino}
  417. %\item
  418. I.Arin\~ o et al., The HERA-B RICH, Nucl.Instr.Meth.Phys.Res.{\bf
  419. A453}(2000)289-295
  420. \bibitem{Akopov}
  421. %\item
  422. N.Akopov et al., The HERMES dual radiator ring imaging Cherenkov
  423. detector, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. {\bf A479}(2002)511-530
  424. \bibitem{Hama}
  425. %\item
  426. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.,
  427. Data Sheet of R5900-L16 and
  428. Data Sheet of R5900-M16  
  429.  
  430. \bibitem{Hama-web}
  431. http://www.hpk.co.jp/hp2e/products/Etd/PDFfiles/PMThd6E.pdf
  432.  
  433. \bibitem{Nappi}
  434. %\item
  435. E.Nappi, RICH detectors,
  436. ICFA'99 Instrumentation School, Istanbul, Turkey, AIP Conference Proceedings,
  437. Vol. 536, p. 60-86.
  438. \bibitem{Eingedi}
  439. %\item
  440. Advances in Cherenkov Light Imaging Techniques and Applications,
  441. eds. A.Breskin, R.Chechik, T.Ypsilantis,
  442. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov
  443. Detectors (RICH98), Ein Gedi, Dead Sea, Israel, November 15 -20, 1998,
  444. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. {\bf A433}(1999)
  445. %\end{enumerate}
  446.  
  447. \end{thebibliography}
  448. \end{sloppypar}
  449. \end{document}
  450.  
  451.  
  452.  
  453.  
  454.